Rules of Engagement
Published on Monday, 21st September 2020
There’s an immense amount of power in the relationships that
have been set, and its power that is really centralised. It’s like a pyramid, a
zigurrat, the Director in the penthouse suite, Bladerunner-style. All of the power is drawn upwards - this
energy is drawn upwards. The Director
gets a physical kick out of it – he’s 140 years old, and he gets literally a
life-force buzz out of shocking people, so there’s some return signal that
energises him, gives him more power. The
reset button is a way of ensuring the hierarchy is maintained. The reset button
induces amnesia, they forget about power structures and whatever power they
had, which is now back in the hands of the Director.
Somebody somehow is immune to the amnesia, they recall elements
of the surveillance and can see it happening to others. They can see the effects on other people,
it’s anaesthetising as well as amnesiac, but this one immune person wants to
question it, and that forces them into action, lets them overcome their fear
and seek to help others. Eventually this
leads to other people becoming aware too.
There could be an element of whistle-blowing going on – one of the scrutinisers
starts to question why we have to report the lack of engagement up the chain,
there might be something else going on there that doesn’t fit in with the rules
of engagement. You’re writing these
reports and they’re going nowhere, they’re disappearing into thin air, or are
being used to monitor your performance as a scrutiniser, which is hideous. And close to our actual jobs. You could write
a uni policy document on rules of engagement that had all this stuff in it, and
it would be fine, no one would think it was bad.
So as a last reflection, I framed this as a dystopia but it’s
actually kind of wishful thinking, I wish someone would just push the button so
that I can just forget and get back on with it.
If you like this story, but want to change it, why not make your own copy and TurnItInto your own story